Winners! but.. without the senate?

Date Published:

Posted 2020-Nov-5 6:07am UTC (midnight Nov 4 US Eastern Time)

Updated:

307* (306) votes? But is Harris, the ‘heir apparent’ a winner without the senate?

There have been two big surprises on and following election day. The first, is how precisely election results have been in line with predictions:

  • as predicted, Trump would narrowly lead on election night based on counted votes
  • as predicted, Trump would declare victory on election night
  • if the last prediction is correct, the Trump initial lead will fall apart once all votes are counted, so as predicted Biden/Harris will win
  • again as predicted, a Trump victory will now require a ‘filibuster’ tactic, preventing one or more states being able to submit their nomination by December 8.

The second surprise has been how calm it has all been so far. Here is hoping it stays that way!

Estimated Presidential Outcome from Here

There are also elections for ‘the house’ (congress) and for the senate, but most people are focused on the election of the president.

On current counts, Biden/Harris would be expected to win the electoral college by 307 to 231.(306-232see update) Almost the same margin Trump won by in 2016. Due to lack of data, this calculation omits the possibility of a ‘flip’ in North Carolina.

As discussed before, last night there were 5 key states where Trump led in the count but there was a significant chance Biden would win. There were also two states where Biden led by a slim margin, although I do not predict a change in the position in those states.

The ‘pivot’ states where Trump led:

  • Wisconsin
    • Biden took the lead by less than 1% so Trump can request a recount
  • Michigan
    • Biden took the lead by over 1% blocking a recount, but Trump has filed a legal challenge
  • Pennsylvania
    • Trump still leads but the projected final outcome is Biden 3.6 million votes to Trump 3.4 million votes (see below)
  • Georgia
    • Trump still leads but the projected final outcome is Biden 2,587,451 votes to Trump 2,501,889 votes (see below) which is a lead of 86 thousand votes
  • North Carolina
    • Trump still leads – but I have no updated vote count over a time of almost one entire day. This means no projection is available.

In Pennsylvania between last night (or technically early this morning) with 74% of the vote counted, and tonight with 89% of the vote counted, Trump rose from 2,964,853 votes to 2,215,969 votes, which is 16,741 votes per percentage point which if continued would yield a final count of 3,400,121 votes. Biden rose from 2,286,865 votes to 3,051,555 votes, which is 50,979 votes per percentage point which if continued would yield a final count of 3,612,328 votes.

In Georgia between last night (or technically early this morning) with 92% of the vote counted, and tonight with 95% of the vote counted, Trump rose from 2,381,870 votes to 2,426,877 votes, which is 15,002 votes per percentage point which if continued would yield a final count of 2,501,889 votes. Biden rose from 2,279,736 votes to 2,395,129 votes, which is 38,464 votes per percentage point which if continued would yield a final count of 2,587,450 votes. The small percentage increase means rounding may make the numbers imprecise, but even calculating based on the rise representing 4% and there being only 4% of votes remaining to be counted, Biden would still win by over 38,000 votes.

Arizona, and particularly Nevada are tight, but in both cases the locations with the most votes to be counted favor Biden, so I cannot see either state returning to Trump.

The last step is that the data I have shows Biden winning both districts in the split system of Maine, and one district of the three districts in the split vote in Nebraska. Other tallies do not seem to reflect this, but I am not sure why. Maybe this is an error in the source data, and it is an error my count will be out by 1.

The Path for Donald Trump: Filibuster

This projection means Trump needs to have votes from 3 states disallowed for Trump to win. Should Pennsylvania or Georgia not complete the count of votes, or the trend of current votes change resulting in a Trump victory, in either or both states, the path for Trump would be much clearer.

Trump has ‘lawyered up’ in sufficient states, but changing the outcome in 3 states it a huge ask.

One or two states would be ‘unprecedented’ (in the year of unprecedented use of the word unprecedented), but three? Surely if the challenge does end up at 3 states, Trump will fold. Biden has already offered the olive branch suggesting there is no plan to treat the other party as the enemy. Does this even suggest a pardon?

However, it is still likely there will be bitter noises and tweets from Trumps, inciting his adulating supporters to feel there is a grave injustice. They may feel for them that the moral path now includes violence and civil disobedience. So far I am aware of no significant post-election violence, and hopefully none will occur. There have been protests, and armed protestors, but the no significant issues so far.

Congress and the Senate

Congress will remain under Democrat control, although, should the Presidential election be decided by congress, Republicans still control the majority of states, so Republicans can determine a president selected by congress.

The major issue for an incoming Biden/Harris Presidency is the Senate, and while technically still possible, it seems unlikely Democrats with have control. Fighting a recession, the Senate could put politics over country and block any stimulus package.

Biden/Harris: is winning a good thing?

It is a tough time to take over the reins to the US government. For Biden, it is the pinnacle of a long political career. For Harris, having already run for president it is her apprenticeship. For Harris, it has to run well.

There is a pandemic to deal with, a deep economic recession, a very divided nation, and a hostile Senate and hostile Supreme court.

The problem of the pandemic does not simply go away. I saw a statistic that something like 91% of Trump supporters feel the virus is under control compared to 7% Biden supporters. Things will likely get worse before the new presidency starts, and a change of president will likely not change the approach of the partisan electorate. About the same number of people will take steps to avoid the virus: almost all Democrats and very few Republicans. Change will be hard.

On top of that, actions to combat the virus may be blocked by the senate and the supreme court could make life more difficult by striking down the affordable care act. Biden pledged to introduced an improved health insurance scheme, which may be impossible with a hostile senate. Health will be off to a troubling start.

Then there is the recession. Most businesses that hire people could really do with the planned stimulus, but again, that could be blocked by the senate. The big tech companies alone can drive the Dow higher, but do little to solve employment nationwide. The economy could become a two speed mess that leaves most people hurting while again the rich get richer. A return to positive economic indicators while most people feel pain.

It could be a very difficult presidency, leading to a difficult mid-term when it could be the turn of Harris to take the lead role, given that Biden would then be weeks from his 82nd birthday.

Update: 8:49 PM Thursday, 5 November 2020

That error of 1 vote bothers me.

Reviewing the changes from 2016:

Wins for Biden/Harris

  • 1 district in Nebraska (Biden leads in one district)
  • 1 district in Maine No-Maine is still split 3-1
  • Arizona (11)
  • Wisconsin (10)
  • Michigan (16)
  • Pennsylvania (20)
  • Georgia (16)

Total= 75 74

Tally for Trump, 306-75 = 231, Tally for Biden 232+75 = 307

Ok, all the maps should Biden winning a district in Nebraska.

And, all the maps show Trump previously held one district in Maine, but lost that district?

Ok, now I find the problem. Of the four votes from Maine, only 3 are allocated so far. The fourth vote for the rural district is not allocated. That fourth vote will almost certainly go to Trump… so my previous count had an error of 1, because it gave all votes from Maine to Biden, not 3 of 4 votes to Biden and 1 to Trump. Total should be 306 Biden, 232 Trump!

[TheChamp-Sharing]
[TheChamp-FB-Comments]

Table of Contents

Categories

Why do so many Americans support Trump in 2024: They’re not all crazy or weird, many fear being disenfranchised.

To many people, both those within the US as well as perhaps most outside the US, a vote for Trump is seen as something hard to understand and even seen as the uneducated or the domain “others”: people seen as are very different from “normal people”. Yet 50% Americans are not radically different “others”, nor uneducated, nor stupid, even though around 50% will vote for trump.

With around 80% of Americans believing the country is on the “wrong track”, is it any surprise a large number feel if trends continue, they risk being disenfranchised by that “wrong track” and are desperate to believe only a big change can protect their rights?

Read More »

Mechanics of US Presidential Elections: A warts and all outsider’s primer.

George Washington was elected unanimously by the 69 electors from the 10 participating states in the in augural election of a US president in 1788. In practice how the system works in the 21st century’s USA of over 330 million people is very different from in the USA of 1788 with less than 4 million people, the underlying principle is still that the states each choose electors to an electoral college who together determine who is to be the president, but in practice today the people of each state get to vote for how their states electors will vote.

This is how it works, and a look at what could possibly stop it working as expected.

Read More »

Biden-Harris the sequel: No choice for US voters?

Like many others, back in February 2024 I wrote that A Biden-Harris ticket would not cut it for the 2024 election. The debate highlighted the problems of US voters again being faced with Biden and Trump: almost no one sees this as a choice between two good options.

The Biden problem will be resolved, but no, it was not just about losing a debate, it was about his inability to maintain his train of thought during the debate, and the risk that presents for another full term in office. Arguably, the focus has all along been only on polarisation and wins for political parties, rather than visions for the future.

Democracy should offer the people choices of a say in their future, but under current systems becomes more about personalities. Looking deeper reveals even without the current issues, it is unclear the US voters get a real choice and real say in what elections should determine.

Read More »

The economy is about consumer spending not production: Confirmed by Swiftonomics.

All economics seem to agree that the Taylor Swift Eras tour boosted the economy everywhere she went, but while it is clear that there was a boost to spending, it is not so clear people benefit beyond getting to enjoy a concert.

This is a look at whether, at least in some cases, factors that boost an economy may do nothing to increase wealth within that economy and could even reduce wealth within that economy.

Read More »

Biden-Harris, won’t cut it, but will they both take a step back for democracy and the Trump Biden rematch?

A step back for Biden would be to run for vice-president in 2024, and for Harris it would be off the ticket.

From this point on, it seems hard to argue that age will not hinder Biden’s chances of defeating Trump in 2024, and without Harris having generated sufficient enthusiasm, the Democrats really need a team refresh to take the polls.

While technically they have plenty of time, in practice to make a smooth change they are running out of time and would need the support of both Biden and Harris.

Read More »

Pressing problem: Perspective on immigration in America & other developed countries.

I just watched a video I found disturbing on CNN arguing the case that America is a better place than most American’s believe.

It was disturbing not because like everywhere else, the US has imperfections, or that America is a bad place, but because it felt like the commentor, and member of the press, was not focused on interests of the people of America but considered only commercial interests when evaluating the direction in which the country should be headed.

In looking at the instincts of the free press even in a leading country like America, there may be valuable insights is to what is wrong across the planet.

Read More »

Discover more from One Finite Planet

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading