The Power struggle in Australia.

[posts_like_dislike]
Page Contents
Topics

Relevant Topics:

All Topics
More On This Topic

Why do so many Americans support Trump in 2024: They’re not all crazy or weird, many fear being disenfranchised.

To many people, both those within the US as well as perhaps most outside the US, a vote for Trump is seen as something hard to understand and even seen as the uneducated or the domain “others”: people seen as are very different from “normal people”. Yet 50% Americans are not radically different “others”, nor uneducated, nor stupid, even though around 50% will vote for trump.

With around 80% of Americans believing the country is on the “wrong track”, is it any surprise a large number feel if trends continue, they risk being disenfranchised by that “wrong track” and are desperate to believe only a big change can protect their rights?

Read More »

Mechanics of US Presidential Elections: A warts and all outsider’s primer.

George Washington was elected unanimously by the 69 electors from the 10 participating states in the in augural election of a US president in 1788. In practice how the system works in the 21st century’s USA of over 330 million people is very different from in the USA of 1788 with less than 4 million people, the underlying principle is still that the states each choose electors to an electoral college who together determine who is to be the president, but in practice today the people of each state get to vote for how their states electors will vote.

This is how it works, and a look at what could possibly stop it working as expected.

Read More »

Biden-Harris the sequel: No choice for US voters?

Like many others, back in February 2024 I wrote that A Biden-Harris ticket would not cut it for the 2024 election. The debate highlighted the problems of US voters again being faced with Biden and Trump: almost no one sees this as a choice between two good options.

The Biden problem will be resolved, but no, it was not just about losing a debate, it was about his inability to maintain his train of thought during the debate, and the risk that presents for another full term in office. Arguably, the focus has all along been only on polarisation and wins for political parties, rather than visions for the future.

Democracy should offer the people choices of a say in their future, but under current systems becomes more about personalities. Looking deeper reveals even without the current issues, it is unclear the US voters get a real choice and real say in what elections should determine.

Read More »

The economy is about consumer spending not production: Confirmed by Swiftonomics.

All economics seem to agree that the Taylor Swift Eras tour boosted the economy everywhere she went, but while it is clear that there was a boost to spending, it is not so clear people benefit beyond getting to enjoy a concert.

This is a look at whether, at least in some cases, factors that boost an economy may do nothing to increase wealth within that economy and could even reduce wealth within that economy.

Read More »

Biden-Harris, won’t cut it, but will they both take a step back for democracy and the Trump Biden rematch?

A step back for Biden would be to run for vice-president in 2024, and for Harris it would be off the ticket.

From this point on, it seems hard to argue that age will not hinder Biden’s chances of defeating Trump in 2024, and without Harris having generated sufficient enthusiasm, the Democrats really need a team refresh to take the polls.

While technically they have plenty of time, in practice to make a smooth change they are running out of time and would need the support of both Biden and Harris.

Read More »

Pressing problem: Perspective on immigration in America & other developed countries.

I just watched a video I found disturbing on CNN arguing the case that America is a better place than most American’s believe.

It was disturbing not because like everywhere else, the US has imperfections, or that America is a bad place, but because it felt like the commentor, and member of the press, was not focused on interests of the people of America but considered only commercial interests when evaluating the direction in which the country should be headed.

In looking at the instincts of the free press even in a leading country like America, there may be valuable insights is to what is wrong across the planet.

Read More »
All Topics

Page Contents

From "the biggest corruption scandal ever" in Brazil, problems in Venezuela, human rights in Saudi Arabia and Iran, to the problems caused by lobbyists against action on climate change, an abundance of fossil fuels is a source of political power, yet rarely force for good, and Australia, with a wealth of coal and gas, is not spared.

The current crisis in Ukraine not only drives up energy prices globally, but it also creates a dilemma for gas producing nations.

The Power struggle in Australia.

From "the biggest corruption scandal ever" in Brazil, problems in Venezuela, human rights in Saudi Arabia and Iran, to the problems caused by lobbyists against action on climate change, an abundance of fossil fuels is a source of political power, yet rarely force for good, and Australia, with a wealth of coal and gas, is not spared.

The current crisis in Ukraine not only drives up energy prices globally, but it also creates a dilemma for gas producing nations.

Former Australian Prime Minister using coal as a ‘prop’ while promoting the industry in parliament.

Australia: The bigger picture.

Australia has solar and wind resources that could enable it to become a renewable energy superpower, but any attempt to make that transition must get past a fossil fuel industry lobby that has proved all powerful in the past.

The result been that Australia is often seen as a climate action ‘pariah’, with both major political parties significantly funded by fossil fuel interests.

I will update this section with more on how Australia has become an outlier on action on climate and has squandered opportunities in renewables over the next few months, as this webpaper is an early version.

The Australian Natural Gas Dilemma of 2022.

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has, either intentionally or accidentally, fed into a global inflation crisis, and at the centre, is gas prices, with Russia being the world’s largest gas supplier.

One consequence is a dilemma for Australia: what to do about gas prices.

The price of natural gas in Australia has increased ten-fold (10x) in the past 18 months, while the cost has remained the same.

A significant contribution to rising inflation in Australia, is not increased costs, but soaring profits of a cartel of 5 fossil fuel companies.

The good news for Australia, is that because these profits are based on international prices for natural gas driven up due to the crisis in Ukraine, the result is record export earnings, lifting the Australian export earnings to result in a record trade surplus.

Record trade surplus thanks to Russia.

If only all shareholders of the 5 companies in the cartel were Australians, it would better help the overall economy as much as it helps tax revenues.

Still the bottom line is not just consumers, but also the rest of industry that relies on power prices, are all suffering to support the 5 companies of the cartel, who are already rich from export earnings.

To interfere in the market is against the principles of a free market, but does the market really have to be so much freer than Norway, where all citizens enjoy an improved standard of living because the nation earns are share of the revenues from that which was dug up from under national territory.

In the end, it comes down to the power of influence of the fossil fuel companies, which was demonstrated on a recent new program broadcast on the national news network, the ABC, Sunday October 30th.

The only suggested action on the program, was to support calls by the CEO Australian Petroleum Production & Exploration Association (fossil fuel lobby) for more access to the country’s resources, by overturning regulations by the states limiting exploration.

The logic seems to be:

  1. Future investments in fossil fuel projects are dependent on the increased prices that resulted from the conflict in Ukraine.
  2. Prices in Australia, which currently are set by international prices most set in Europe, will fall if Australia expands its natural gas exploration.

The suggestion seems to be that expansion of exploration in Australia will bring gas prices down in Europe, to the level that was made possible by gas pipelines from Russia. So, there is no need to decouple prices in Australia from those paid in Europe, as the global problem will be solved by a little more exploration in Australia.

Or is it that this will enable even more revenues for that cartel of natural gas suppliers, so there is a lot of money available influences whoever necessary and unlock even bigger profits?

Yet, this was not questioned on the report. Largely because news networks need content fed to them as there is insufficient funding to generate their own content, particularly on weekends, which means they end up being spokespeople for those with the budget to provide content.

Australia as a renewable energy superpower.

Primary Australia: The mentality of fossil fuels and raw materials Australia.

Record trade surplus thanks to Russia.

In April 2022, Australia achieved a record trade surplus, according to the report by Alan Kohler, courtesy of the high global prices of coal and gas.

This would only be possible, if coal and gas make up a significant part of Australia’s exports. A search reveals that, overall, resources, which basically means mining, accounts for over 60% of Australia’s exports, according to the Reserve Bank of Australia.

Prior to 1960, Australian exports were over 60% agriculture, and 10% resources, and in 2021 they were over 60% resources, and 10% agriculture. However, the entire time around 70% of all exports were primary products.

Most products are now exported without further processing. An example of this is steel, which peaked as an export in 1998, and fallen to 1/3 of the level since then despite Australia’s iron ore exports having risen significantly in that period. In contrast, steel imports have risen. Australia exports both iron ore and coal, which are used to produce steel in other countries, and Australia then imports that steel.

However, most steel imported to Australia that began as iron ore and coal exported from Australia, is import as manufactured goods such as cars and white goods.

Hydrogen: Renewables for primary Australia.

A popular concept is that Australia can move from exporting energy as coal and natural gas, to exporting energy as hydrogen. Then Australia’s customer for iron ore and other minerals will still have the energy to process these other resources.

The idea is that the fossil fuel revenues, can be replace by hydrogen revenues and nothing else changes. The problem is, as explained here by Michael Barnard, exporting hydrogen as an energy source simply does not add up.

One attribute of fossil fuels that does not transfer to the age of renewables, is the concept of loading energy on a boat and shipping that energy.

With fossil fuels, the energy was already in stored by photosynthesis hundreds of million years ago. With renewables, energy must be converted into a storable form first, and that always loses a significant amount of the original energy.

Unlike with fossil fuels, which energy rich countries simply mine and export, renewable energy is far better used in the original location.

A renewable energy powerhouse.

Renewable energy is best used closer to the point where it is generated.

This concept really changes, what is an already fast changing world. As a key example, is Australia looks to supply Japan with energy, and iron ore and other resources, in part because Japan is the second largest exporter of cars in the world.

The reality is, Japan is highly unlikely to continue this huge level of car exports, as in the renewable economy, manufacture is best located near the source of renewable energy. While at one time as living standards in Japan rose, it may have become advantageous to relocate manufacturing to a country with lower labour costs, robotics and renewable energy now means the advantage may come from moving manufacturing to a country that is a source of renewable energy.

History:

  • 2022 November 1: First published.

Click on the link(s) for more on topic(s): 

Discover more from One Finite Planet

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading