Will Apple One Day Ditch the Mac/MacBook?

Date Published:

John C Dvorak of suggests in this article that Apple is ready to ditch the Mac.  Is this realistic?  The idea that the Mac is a problem for Apple is something I have suggested in conversation on several occasions, so there are a least two observers, and from different perspectives, seeing that Mac products no longer fit well within the Apple portfolio.  The two perspectives:

  • the messages from apple marketing signal end of the Mac (Dvorak)
  • the mac is at odds with Apple revenue strategy and new customer base (Me)

For background on the marketing signals, see the Dvorak article. Here are my additions.

Mac Revenue: Poor Cousin to iPad Revenues

Apple gains a better profit per unit on iPad Pro vs MacBook.  Every iPad or iPhone continues to earn Apple revenue once it is sold, but the MacBook sale is much more a one off.  Computers run application programs.  With the iPad all of those application programs must be purchased through Apple, while with the Macbook, they can be purchased direct whoever produces the software.  Wish to add an Adobe application?  For the iPad, Apple will earn revenue but for the Macbook, the purchase can be direct from adobe.  The same for every application, and this mounts up.  While a MacBook can initially be more expensive, and thus the initial sale generate more revenue, the iPad wins over time.  Remember the initial revenue is only a percentage margin.  Apple has to do a lot of work for that revenue and has high costs. If there is a cost overrun the margin is reduced.  But with that commission on a sale of Adobe Photoshop, Apple has basically no cost, and the revenue is all profit.

This means that for Apple, the MacBook can be a competitor to the iPad Pro, and every sale of a MacBook can result in a loss of revenue in comparison with an iPad sale.

Apple New Customer Base

Part 2….coming soon

[TheChamp-Sharing]
[TheChamp-FB-Comments]

Table of Contents

Categories

EV Range & Economy: Decoding the Numbers.

The key specification for EVs so far has been ‘range’. But how are the numbers measured, will range specific match reality, and can the number even be compared?

It turns out there are even 3 different standards for measuring range, and they give very different answers!

Further, why have we moved from ‘economy’ to ‘range’? Is there still even economy with EVs?

Read More »

Electric Cars: 2021, EVs Just Don’t add up (yet).

Right now, without subsidies, buying an electric car does not objectively add up. Currently there is a price premium, and as a result EVs only appeal to those happy to pay a premium to indulge a passion.
Some buyers are prepared to pay a premium for the environment, “the future” or the acceleration, but right now, buying is driven by passion and/or subsidies.

Read More »

5G, Wi-Fi 7 (WiFi), Bluetooth & UWB: Why do we need them, and how do they all fit?

I recently researched 5G, in order to understand what it was all about, and the reality of any possible new health risks. I came to the conclusions that 1) health risk claims are groundless, and 2) there is no logical reason to upgrade devices at this time to get 5G. But that research led to questions on how all the connectivity standards fit together, and how compelling might it be to upgrade devices to get benefits of new Wi-Fi, Bluetooth or UWB?

Read More »

Discover more from One Finite Planet

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading