Australian Record Trade Surplus: good news, or a warning on automation?

Date Published:

skitched20truckAs explained by ‘Alan Kohler’ of the ABC, the record trade surplus is largely due to “A huge rebound in iron ore, coal and gold exports delivers a record trade surplus of $3.5 billion in December, providing a big boost to national income.”, with no proportional increase in imports.

I suggest an analysis of the impact on the Australian economy is reason for people around the world to consider the impact of automation.

There is some good news for some, but it is clearly evident, that unlike the mining boom of the early 2000s, this record level (and thus even greater boom in some ways) sees the states where the mining takes place still in economic decline. In place of the the boom times these states enjoyed as a result of mining in the past, this time those states have no economic lift at all . This is at least in part due to the revolution in automation that has taken place in recent years.  Bear in mind that this same type of revolution is planned for almost every industry in the near future.

What created the previous  ‘mining boom’?

In the early 2000s, the states of Queensland and particularly Western Australia, enjoyed economic ‘booms’ attributed to mining. Whole new towns were created to house the miners.  The industry of building those new towns created more employment and more people who also needed housing and every other service people need. For each job created directly in the mine, building the infrastructure to support the mine (such as road or rail) and the new towns, there was a flow on effect of hairdressers, cafes, and every other service a community needs.

What has changed?

The mining boom led to rapidly climbing real estate prices, very strong employment and rising wages until the GFC. Since that time these economies have slowed significantly.  But now, with actual record surplus largely attributed to mining, employment in these states is still lower, real estate still stagnant and there are no indications of a new boom.  Cleary things are different this time , and among those things is automation.  The fully automated mine is a reality, and even automated transport around the mine, and to and from the mine.

The Economic Impact.

Beyond the tax office, almost the only Australians to gain any share of the mining derived export revenues now are those (mostly very wealthy) shareholders of the mining companies. Note that not all shareholders of these companies are Australian.  In fact, with this new boom,  while the boom raises tax revenue, the amount raised is less than when labour is a significant cost.  The people earning salaries also pay tax and are less able to tax minimise than major corporations so while any boom does raise tax revenue, a boom with employment is best even for taxes.  So the share of wealth going to taxes is also reduced, just not as savagely as the share spread through the community.

Simply put, the wealth is still created, but not distributed through the community.  Tackling this problem as automation spreads worldwide and through more and more industries is a key challenge society is now facing.

Further

businessinsider: rio tinto, self-driving trucks

theguardian.com: technology driverless mining trucks

 

[TheChamp-Sharing]
[TheChamp-FB-Comments]

Table of Contents

Categories

Razors vs razorblades: An economic problem for clean energy.

A huge problem with the steps needed to stop burning fossil fuels is they save money, which means less opportunities for profit than there are with fossil fuels.

While “free razorblades” are good for the public, they are just not good for business. Renewables just lack that ongoing revenue stream since none so far profits from the supply of sun and wind. Even EVs erode ongoing revenues streams in the automotive industry and thus negatively impact the economy.

The problem is that while the economy reflects what is good for big business and tax revenues, the economy does not always reflect what is good for the people.

So, which is better, continuing with fossil fuels in order to produce ongoing revenue streams for the economy, or an economy that works for the people with systems require less consumables?

Read More »

The Roles of Employment & Wealth in Society.

This is an examination of the roles of employment in society which include wealth creation and distribution and there also requires defining what is mean by ‘wealth’ in this context. This a reference page as background to deeper explorations on the impact or robotics, the arguments for a ‘living wage’ or basic income, and other topics.

Read More »

Wealth & Happiness Vs Population: Does Farming Humans pay?

The powerful and the wealthy know that increasing population is good for the economy as measured by GDP, but what does this “farming humans” approach achieve for the population themselves?

The larger the population, the greater the power from being leader, but it turns out that, if anything this leads to less individual wealth and happiness. Countries are a finite size with finite resources. Having more people means, on average, a smaller share each. Of course, everyone’s share isn’t equal, and those with enough wealth, can still even grow their share, leaving less for everyone else.

It is not just politicians who benefit at the expense of the masses, as the larger the population, the greater the GSD for big business and stock market indices, and the greater the wealth for wealthiest, so all the boxes are ticked for those with the greatest influence.

Read More »

Discover more from One Finite Planet

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading