The G20 outcome, a plan to make the earth a worse place?

Date Published:

The recent G20 wrapped up with a commitment to target economic growth level for the G20 of 2.1% by 2018.

Global population grwoth is over 1.1% so this means the worlds richest countries will be getting richer by just over 1% avove population increase per annum by 2018.  Is there any suggestion that this addional wealth to the richest will be distributed to the poorer? No.

In fact there is not really a plan to have this additional wealth distributed internally in each rich nation.  For reference, see this bloomberg article:

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-10-02/top-1-got-93-of-income-growth-as-rich-poor-gap-widened.html

In other words, most of the 2.2% over the entire economy will be distributed to the richest 20% (5% in the article, but lets be conservative any allow for things to get radically better) leaving significantly less than 1/4 of the amount to provide growth for most people.

In other words, the net wealth of most people in G20 nations will decline within the target period, but the rich will make real gains.

Of course the G20 is a meeting of governements, and governments tax the entire population so they WILL get 2.1% increase. In fact, the more the increase wealth is skewed to be earned by the rich, since the rich pay higher percentage taxes, the better for governements.

So we have a target that sees the richest governents, and the richest people within the countries with the richest governments, have increased wealth at the expense of most citizens of these G20 nations.

But wait, the truth is when you put it in perspective, it is actually worse than that.  This is a plan of the richest governements to manage their own wealth and totally ignore what happens to the poorest nations, who, let face it, are the ones who most need an increase in wealth.

Imange the news coverage for a conference in your country where on the rich could attend that was designed to purely increase the wealth of those rich attending.  Would it receive positve press?  Isn’t this the same simply on a global scale?

[TheChamp-Sharing]
[TheChamp-FB-Comments]

Table of Contents

Categories

Farming Humans & Trickle Up Economics: How the wealthy get wealthy.

It was a reference to the wonderful children’s politician’s fairy tale of ‘trickle down economics’ that started me on the question: How do the wealthy get wealthy?

The answer is by collecting wealth from many people, the more people contributing wealth, the more wealth to be gained.

The effective path to great wealth is farming humans to collect a small amount of wealth or ‘egg’ from a percentage of humans ‘in the farm’, so the more humans in the farm, the more wealth for the farmer.

Read More »

Ageing population: a problem, or only cast as a problem by those with an agenda?

Have you heard of the ‘ageing population problem’? Why is it a problem that people are living longer?

Is the suggestion that retirees can never be productive, but children can be put to work? Really?

Or is the real issue that both sides of the political spectrum find either economic immigration reasons to apply confirmation bias which leads to arguing for a return to the population explosion, and immoral immigration policies that fuel the far right and erode the living standards of societies’ children.

This page looks at the real issues underpinning an ‘ageing population’. The reality is: an ageing population itself is not a real problem, but suggested measures to address it are real problems.

Read More »

Race, Racism and Skin Colour: what do ‘race’ and racism mean?

There is no universally agreed definition of either race or racism, with no clear agreement on whether race is real or not, and there is more agreement on the reality of racism, there is less on exactly what constitutes racism.

This is a look at both the concept of race, and what it means to be racist.

Read More »

Discover more from One Finite Planet

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading